HBO's Satoshi Documentary 'Money Electric' Is An Insult to Bitcoin
CAUTION: SPOILERS AHEAD.
Some say we live in the golden age of documentaries certainly they are being created at a volume far higher than at any point in history, but for every My Octopus Teacher, a genuinely inspiring and unusual human story, theres the opposite: cynical trash like Money Electric.
Lets start by acknowledging that Money Electric upped its own stakes, mounting a week-long hype cycle with the promise of a big reveal that the world would at last know the identity of Bitcoins anonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto.
Maybe lets also put aside the historical baggage there. Sure, many journalists have died on this hill, but surely Money Electric might have something to add to the conversation? After all, from the trailer, they seemingly spent millions of dollars paying for Samson Mows dinners as he evangelized Bitcoin around the world. (Its always great to subsidize education!)
There were even hints that maybe there would be something inspired here, a still shot showing a progression of cypherpunks, all of whom have interesting stories. Maybe the big reveal was just a ruse to keep our attention, and maybe thered be a series of reveals (none taken too seriously) that added up to a compelling story about what Bitcoin is and could be.
Sadly, not. For most of its runtime, Money Electric hides its motives, following its star (director Cullen Hoback) as he dives into the Bitcoin world. But its clear as the film unfolds that the creators had no other motive than outing someone as Satoshi.
How else does a big budget film end up indulging in straight conspiracy theory, dredging up the alternative history of the Block Size Wars as a way to introduce accusations that are almost entirely uninteresting?
Hint: The impetus for the big reveal here is that Peter Todd may have worked with a covert government agent to promote his ideas for the Bitcoin roadmap.
Its here where things go off the rails (or start going to the master plan). After making us suffer his own misdirection, Hoback and Co. finally play their cards, unearthing a series of purported evidences that show Adam Back and Peter Todd (as well as Greg Maxwell for some reason) were all secretly Satoshi.
Truly, the most banal and oft-repeated of theories.
From there, we see a series of gotchas that would have all been easily disproved if the directors did basic follow-up research.
Lets review:
- Peter Todd and Adam Back corresponded on the cryptography mailing list when he was young. This is true, and widely known. Its something Peter and Adam comment on publicly and doesnt really say much of anything, besides the fact that the cryptography list was open to the public, and included possibly hundreds of members.
- Peter Todds first BitcoinTalk post occurred around the time Satoshi left Again, another known. In fact, the post is written in Todds snarky style, but were supposed to believe this was him misremembering that he was actually Satoshi and responding to himself. (Or so the director thinks). Nevermind that his forum name at the time was retep, and being that no one knew who he was, he could have easily deleted it.
- Peter Todd once made a joke about deleting Bitcoin. This is used to support the idea that he burned Satoshis keys.
- Adam Back discussed Bitcoin on the cryptography mailing list after Bitcoin was launched Giving credit where credit is due, this is also something I didnt actually know. But again, once looking at the archive we can see the material supports Backs claim he wasnt yet interested in Bitcoin. In the emails, Back is passively reacting to the hype around Bitcoin (then surging above $30), and theres even a reply where he makes a complaint about why Satoshi (whose name he misspelled) didnt add some feature he thought would be beneficial. Again, 5 minutes of Googling.
- Todd and Back were in cahoots, involved in a cover-up to mask the fact that they created Bitcoin. Ta-da. Thats why he never joined Blockstream! (Seriously this is stated, actually, by the director in the film.)
Taking a step back, its hard to know what to say about this sequence except that its both a marvel of creativity and cynicism, and in saying this, know thats in no way a compliment.
To start, Hoback makes no legitimate attempt to engage Back or Todd on his finding. He merely presents the material as he found it, films them reacting, and closes up shop. It makes sense, even someone like me will admit theres a non-zero chance Back or Todd was Satoshi. There arent many people you cant rule out entirely, and they are among them.
Sadly, a non-zero chance is not a smoking gun. Its not proof.
Todd and Backs internet presence, while removed from the web, is accessible. Ive read it. No, they werent the only ones involved in digital cash who erased things.
Of course, with the Magic of editing, and by exposing the findings to no criticism, Im sure many viewers will walk away thinking theyve been shown a clever and well-researched theory.
All Hoback proved to me is that he understands the shortcuts you can take when making a documentary. It alone among creative works allows you to hide all your errors behind editing, while making baseless and dangerous accusations seem plausible.
And to be clear, claiming that someone is Satoshi without evidence is exactly that.
Lets hope no one gets hurt because of his idiocy.
Note: I interviewed a producer for Electric Money at one point in 2021. It was not recorded. I had no subsequent contact with the documentary team.
Read more: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/culture/money-electric-insult-bitcoin-cynical-stupid-dangerous
Text source: Bitcoin Magazine: Bitcoin News, Articles, Charts,
