W o r l d . C r y p t o . G l o b a l

Loading

Welcome at World Crypto Global. This portal is packed with useful content and resources to built out your own crypto skills. WorldCrypto is a site member of Gabriel Vega Network.

Contact Info

CATEGORY: ethereum node


A Long-Gone Ethereum Co-Founder Speaks Out - Why He Sees Possible DANGER of Ethereum 2.0 Heading Towards CENTRALIZATION...

Author: noreply@blogger.com (Silicon Valley Newsroom)
United States
Oct 01, 2022 12:35

A Long-Gone Ethereum Co-Founder Speaks Out - Why He Sees Possible DANGER of Ethereum 2.0 Heading Towards CENTRALIZATION...


While no longer part of the Ethereum Foundation, Anthony Di Iorio was one of the developers behind Ethereum when it launched in 2015. While he has since moved on to other ventures, he resurfaced this week, sharing concerns on ETH 2.0 in an interview

These concerns revolve about the level of centralization that Ethereum could reach now that the merge to Proof of Stake is complete.

Di Iorio's concern revolves around the possibility of major exchanges becoming an overwhelming number of the total validators on the network. 

At the root of the issue is the requirement to hold 32 ETH to launch a node -so exchanges holding thousands of ETH have an obvious advantage...

That's a little over $42,000 worth of Ethereum at the time of publishing - and it is reasonable to say this prices out the average person, who previously could have started mining for under $1000 if they were interested in contributing to the network. 

So\when the rule is "More ETH = more nodes" you immediately see the potential power major exchanges have by holding thousands of users Ethereum. Even many mid-size exchanges hold enough to launch hundreds of nodes.

However, users need to agree to use any ETH that they actually own, exchanges cannot decide how to allocate your holdings without permission.

So they're getting user permission by offering to share the profits - this factor is the reason many people see these nodes as decentralize.The nodes may be initially launched by an exchange but they're made from the Ethereum of many different people, the exchanges just brought them all together.

More importantly, all these people have the power to pull out whenever they wish. 

Can these really be considered exchange-owned nodes if their users have the power to shut them down by collectively pulling out?

Still, ETH 2.0 is off to a more centralized start than many expected.  Last week nodes launched by just 2 addresses were validating 46% of total transactions.  One is a known pool, the other an 'unknown entity'... which nobody likes to hear. 

The move away from GPU mining is a double-edged sword when it comes to decentralization...

It may not be as simple as looking at who now has an easier entry to becoming a validator, but for a large number of people, Ethereum's update represents a door opening.

On that note, Di Iorio also acknowledged that the Proof of Stake model allows people from countries that have banned GPU mining to participate again (such as Algeria, Bangladesh, Bolivia, China, Colombia, Egypt, Indonesi and more) many of them pointing to the large amount of electricity consumed by miners as their reasoning, an issue the new Ethereum now solves.

-------------------
Author: Oliver Redding
Seattle Newsdesk  / Breaking Crypto News

 

Subscribe to GCP in a reader

A Long-Gone Ethereum Co-Founder Speaks Out - The DANGER of Ethereum 2.0...

Author: noreply@blogger.com (Silicon Valley Newsroom)
United States
Oct 13, 2022 09:10

A Long-Gone Ethereum Co-Founder Speaks Out - The DANGER of Ethereum 2.0...


While no longer part of the Ethereum Foundation, Anthony Di Iorio was one of the developers behind Ethereum when it launched in 2015. While he has since moved on to other ventures, he resurfaced this week, sharing concerns on ETH 2.0 in an interview

These concerns revolve about the level of centralization that Ethereum could reach now that the merge to Proof of Stake is complete.

Di Iorio's concern revolves around the possibility of major exchanges becoming an overwhelming number of the total validators on the network. 

At the root of the issue is the requirement to hold 32 ETH to launch a node -so exchanges holding thousands of ETH have an obvious advantage...

That's a little over $42,000 worth of Ethereum at the time of publishing - and it is reasonable to say this prices out the average person, who previously could have started mining for under $1000 if they were interested in contributing to the network. 

So\when the rule is "More ETH = more nodes" you immediately see the potential power major exchanges have by holding thousands of users Ethereum. Even many mid-size exchanges hold enough to launch hundreds of nodes.

However, users need to agree to use any ETH that they actually own, exchanges cannot decide how to allocate your holdings without permission.

So they're getting user permission by offering to share the profits - this factor is the reason many people see these nodes as decentralize.The nodes may be initially launched by an exchange but they're made from the Ethereum of many different people, the exchanges just brought them all together.

More importantly, all these people have the power to pull out whenever they wish. 

Can these really be considered exchange-owned nodes if their users have the power to shut them down by collectively pulling out?

Still, ETH 2.0 is off to a more centralized start than many expected.  Last week nodes launched by just 2 addresses were validating 46% of total transactions.  One is a known pool, the other an 'unknown entity'... which nobody likes to hear. 

The move away from GPU mining is a double-edged sword when it comes to decentralization...

It may not be as simple as looking at who now has an easier entry to becoming a validator, but for a large number of people, Ethereum's update represents a door opening.

On that note, Di Iorio also acknowledged that the Proof of Stake model allows people from countries that have banned GPU mining to participate again (such as Algeria, Bangladesh, Bolivia, China, Colombia, Egypt, Indonesi and more) many of them pointing to the large amount of electricity consumed by miners as their reasoning, an issue the new Ethereum now solves.

-------------------
Author: Oliver Redding
Seattle Newsdesk  / Breaking Crypto News

 

Subscribe to GCP in a reader

OpenEthereum support ends with the Merge fast approaching

Author: Cointelegraph By Jesse Coghlan
United States
May 25, 2022 08:25

OpenEthereum support ends with the Merge fast approaching

“The usefulness has run its course,” the OpenEthereum team wrote regarding its popular software, “we look forward to the next phase of clean, green and massively scalable blockchain infrastructure.”

Cloudflare to run Ethereum node experiment to help 'build a better internet'

Author: Cointelegraph By Brian Quarmby
United States
May 18, 2022 08:20

Cloudflare to run Ethereum node experiment to help 'build a better internet'

“Cloudflare is going to participate in the research and development of the core infrastructure that helps keep Ethereum secure, fast, as well as energy-efficient for everyone,” the firm stated.

The Purge  Vitaliks plan to reduce Ethereums bloat

Author: Cointelegraph by Josh O'Sullivan
United States
Oct 27, 2024 12:00

The Purge Vitaliks plan to reduce Ethereums bloat

Vitalik Buterins The Purge aims to streamline Ethereum by reducing data bloat, simplifying the protocol and addressing technical debt for better efficiency.

Your Crypto Gateway

Claim 1,000
Free WCG Coins

World Crypto Global opens the door to digital freedom for everyone.
Manage your free WCG Coins securely—where simplicity meets global accessibility.

11 bn

FREE CRYPTO COINS

8.9 bn

AVAILABLE FOR RESERVATION

2.1 bn+

ALREADY ALLOCATED

× WCG Coin

🎉 Get 1,000 WCG Coins

No fees. No catch. Your crypto journey starts here.